I offer some thoughts and, hopefully, understanding of a problem that some might think of as a “First World Problem”– namely, the frequency with which things break down in our everyday life and our inability to get the proper and prompt help we need to fix them. This happens primarily in the digital world, including our devices, website functionality, internet connectivity, and –the elephant in the room—our inability to get direct human help from anyone to fix problems or breakdowns in any of these arenas. The result is a toxic feeling of helplessness which is, perhaps, the most toxic of all human emotions. People react to and defend themselves against helplessness in only three ways: 1) they become depressed, 2) they get angry, or 3) they somehow go about making other people feel helpless. I argue that the blame for these breakdowns and for the absence of adequate support and help in our digital world lies with the corporations, the companies, the institutions that seek to save money by reducing funding for Customer or Technical Support.
The Politics of Victimhood: A Dangerous Narrative [Trump]
In this episode, I analyze how victimhood works, psychologically and politically. When someone experiences him or herself as a victim, it gives that persona a kind of get-out-of-jail free card to retaliate, strike back, and hurt the person or group that they have come to believe is responsible for their victimization. The political Right capitalizes on this dynamic by repeatedly telling its followers that they have been abused, cheated, and victimized by the liberal elites. As a result, these constituencies would have no moral compunction about harming, imprisoning, or deporting immigrants, just as they had no compunction morally about attacking the Capitol to reverse what they thought was a stolen election. Holding oneself up as a victim gives one a sense of moral righteousness which then can then morally permit violent retaliatory and cruel action. This is what we see on the Right today.
Inevitability That Trump Will Contest Any Election Result in Which He Loses.
In this first episode of my webcast, I address the issue of how to understand Trump’s need, his compulsive relentless need, to exaggerate his own accomplishments, ego, and greatness. I explain how the mind works -in all of us — to limit, reduce, negate, or otherwise get rid of painful feeling states, an effort often accomplished by exaggerating their opposite. This is a universal experience and expression of the workings of the normal human psyche. In fact, one can often infer very accurately the states of mind that are the most forbidden or intolerable by examining and understanding the ways that the person suffering from these painful states of mind goes about trying to reduce their suffering. For Trump, his bloviating narcissism, conceit, self-aggrandizing and clownish self-promotion obviously comes from his dread and intolerance of any suggestion or any feeling that he’s helpless, inferior, ashamed, or inadequate. I make the argument in this webcast that this isn’t volitional and conscious and intentional but unconscious, automatic, and compulsory. He has no choice. This means that, were he to have lost the election, it isn’t a question of whether or not he would have contested it or fomented a civil war to reverse it, but how exactly he would do it because Trump lacks the psychic freedom to do anything else.
